Asking the wrong question about GCJ

ixs' Vodkamelone

Du weisst, dass Blogs doch irgendwie zu Dir durchdringen, wenn Du beim Blick auf dein Mobiltelefon glaubst Dein Provider hieße "Vodkamelone".
     -- Nilsk Ketelsen im IRC

Suche


Aktuelle Einträge

Avocent PM webinterface issues
Samstag, September 7 2019

The missing man page: cyc_ipmicmd - Avocent IPMI power control
Donnerstag, April 30 2015

Better debugging of dracut and systemd inside the initramfs
Freitag, Januar 24 2014

dss_cli, an Open-E Data Storage Server command line interpreter
Donnerstag, Mai 16 2013

Automatischer Login für Deutsche Telekom Hotspots
Sonntag, Juni 10 2012

Link List

CCC
Fedora/RHEL
Mein privater Linkdump
People
Planets

Archive

April 2021
März 2021
Februar 2021
Das Neueste ...
Älteres ...

Letzte Google Suche

??????? ????????? ??? 74
blog.vodkamelone.de
shrek rapidshare.com
shrek rapidshare.com
siemens s65 telefoncode entsperren
how to open pendrive in virtual box fedora
Für immer Shrek rapidshare.com
harddisk image linux kpartx
siemens handy telefoncode entsperren
siemens handy zu 65 entsperren kostenlos
lounge
7526 snom mib
how to install openwrt on arc os
lounge
elmeg ICT VoIP-VPN Gateway passwort
telefon-code siemens
ethtool eeprom
asus 330 hotspot
rittal
how mount centos img file kpartx
virtualbox user group fedora
mikrotik routerboard 433 software
how to access asus 330n3g when it is in ap mode
zontag mag boot usb
HP Display Beleuchtung
dd-wrt mmc formatieren
how does a lounge look like
RB 433 openwrt
update intel nic firmware memory stick
dhcpd3 rb-433
openwrt vlan e1000
telefoncode entsperren siemens
kpartx loop
test https://hotspot.t-mobile.net/wlan/welcome.do
"download firmware openwrt e1000"
telefoncode berechnen siemens
RB433 openwrt add vlan card
virtualbox Ued fedora
elmeg voip-vpn gateway ports
reset intel NIC
nic eeprom
wie bekomme ich den gerätecode siemens
siemens telefoncode eingeben
ip reset mikrotik rb433 l
routerboard 433ah mikrotik
ethtool intel magic

Blog abonnieren

Kategorien



Alle Kategorien

Last played...


Song: Numbers (DJ-Kicks) (Extended Vocal Mix)
Artist: Booka Shade
7. Februar 2015, 02:32

Song: Numbers (DJ-Kicks) (Club Mix)
Artist: Booka Shade
7. Februar 2015, 02:24

Song: Estoril
Artist: Booka Shade
7. Februar 2015, 02:17

Song: Numbers (DJ-Kicks) (Extended Vocal Mix)
Artist: Booka Shade
7. Februar 2015, 02:12

Song: Numbers (DJ-Kicks) (Extended Vocal Mix)
Artist: Booka Shade
12. Januar 2015, 00:43

18. August 2015, 15:15

Hosting von

bawue-net

Impressum
< Spass mit OpenSSH | Liebes Lazyweb - Mir ist zu heiss. >

Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2006

Asking the wrong question about GCJ

Luya is wondering whether Sun's recent press release, stating that they will be allowing distribution of their closed binary Java stack together with the operating system such as debian, fedora et al., means something for the GCJ project or Fedora.

The GCJ project is the GNU Compiler for Java, which aims to be a free replacement for the proprietary JDK from Sun. Right now, it's not there yet, but it's getting there.
However, it's good enough to compile the Java bits from OpenOffice. More about Java on Fedora can be seen on the Fedora Wiki.
For the casual user GCJ is enough. I've been using it for my University assignments exclusivly and it works like a charm. Even though, the compilerun is slooooow.

Anyway, back to Luya's question. Will the ability to ship the closed source JRE and JDK mean that Fedora's focus will shift from GCJ and Classpath?
The easy answer is no.
Fedora is all about free and open software. This will mean, that a closed source Java stack won't get into the Fedora Core nor will it get into Fedora Extras.
In case you need the JRE or JDK from Sun for your Fedora installation, the JPackage Project has some good RPMs.

Actually, the real question should have been, does Sun feel that it's hand is being forced by projects such as GCJ and GNU Glasspath?

Geschrieben von andreas in Fedora um 12:31 | Kommentare (6) | Trackbacks (0)
Als PDF ansehen: Dieser Artikel | Dieser Monat | Vollständiges Blog

Trackbacks
Trackback für spezifische URI dieses Eintrags

Keine Trackbacks

Kommentare
Ansicht der Kommentare: (Linear | Verschachtelt)

Andreas,

presumably you've seen the commotion on the jpackage lists about the new sun license. jpackage.org appear to believe that it's even more restrictive than the old license.

https://www.zarb.org/pipermail/jpackage-discuss/2006-May/009919.html
#1 huw-l (Homepage) am 17.05.2006 14:19 (Antwort)
Ohh great. Actually I haven't seen that Discussion yet.

Thanks for the pointer.

The new license is a real slammer.
#2 ixs (Homepage) am 17.05.2006 14:33 (Antwort)
I thought there was no new Java license yet. Actually, I read an article on Slashdot today that they're 'asking developers to provide feedback on how to best get there and prevent forking and fragmentation' (http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/06/05/16/1756226.shtml).

I know a license that prevents forking is not quite GPL, but you're talking about a 'closed source Java stack'. There is no such thing as a closed source Java stack. The source for Java has been available forever. The license just didn't allow distributing it (so Linux distro's can't ship it on their .iso's).
#3 Nils Breunese am 17.05.2006 15:27 (Antwort)
There is a new license already. Take a look at http://download.java.net/dlj/DLJ-v1.1.txt.
Especially Part 2.

The Java Sources available as the src.zip file are just the majority of the runtime library.

The complete source of the virtual machine is only available after signing a contract. And as far as I know, the garbage collector and the JIT-parts are not available as source.

That is pretty closed source to me. Not unlike Microsoft's Shared Source Initiative.
#4 ixs (Homepage) am 17.05.2006 15:39 (Antwort)
huw-l -- That's not more restrictive than the old license, which has similar but what appear to be more strongly-worded clauses. This one has the phrase "run in conjunction with", which, in my non-lawyer reading, seems to cover some sort of wrapper/helper-app system -- not merely including GCJ in the same distribution.

But really, lawyers probably need to know.
#5 Matthew (Homepage) am 17.05.2006 16:25 (Antwort)
Sun isn't worried about GCJ/Classpath as much as they are worried about Mono. Since the Red Hat lawyers have now decided that Mono is safe to include, Sun's worried that the FLOSS world will go with C# in preference to Java.
#6 Joe Buck am 17.05.2006 18:33 (Antwort)

Kommentar schreiben

Sie können [geshi lang=LANG][/lang] Tags verwenden um Quellcode abhängig von der gewählten Programmiersprache einzubinden
Umschließende Sterne heben ein Wort hervor (*wort*), per _wort_ kann ein Wort unterstrichen werden.
Die angegebene E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht dargestellt, sondern nur für eventuelle Benachrichtigungen verwendet.

Um maschinelle und automatische Übertragung von Spamkommentaren zu verhindern, bitte die Zeichenfolge im dargestellten Bild in der Eingabemaske eintragen. Nur wenn die Zeichenfolge richtig eingegeben wurde, kann der Kommentar angenommen werden. Bitte beachten Sie, dass Ihr Browser Cookies unterstützen muss um dieses Verfahren anzuwenden.
CAPTCHA
 
 

Als PDF ansehen: Dieser Artikel | Dieser Monat | Vollständiges Blog